Did Warp Speed Warp the Regulators?

Sasha Latypova

Sasha Latypova has a background in pharmaceutical research and development. She has worked for over 60 pharmaceutical companies including Pfizer and Johnson and Johnson.

The Naked Emperor summarizes an article by Sasha Latypova: “Did Pfizer Perform Adequate Safety Testing for its Covid-19 mRNA Vaccine in Preclinical Studies? Evidence of Scientific and Regulatory Fraud.” Sasha is or was involved in Pharmaceutical research and development. There are seven points which I’ll list here, but each point is explained and summarized by The Naked Emperor.

1.Pfizer’s program did not include a comprehensive end-to-end test of all components of the final approved product. The studies included in the approval package were for a variety of versions of the product with no comparability assessments, thus no comprehensive assessment of product safety can be made.

2. The toxicity of the vaccine’s mRNA active ingredient was never studied!

3. Pfizer claimed absence of potential for “vaccine-elicited disease enhancement” based on studies of an animal species that does not get sick from Sars-Cov-2.

4. CDC, FDA and Pfizer lied about “vaccine staying in the injection site”

5. Pfizer skipped major categories of safety testing altogether.

6. Pfizer used dishonest and self-serving interpretation of regulatory guidelines to avoid routine safety testing.

7. Both FDA and Pfizer knew about major toxicities associated with gene therapy class of medicines, and therefore cannot claim lack of anticipatory knowledge of these risks. This points to intentional fraud and collusion between Pfizer and the regulators to push this untested dangerous product on the market.

Read The Naked Emperor’s Full Article (opens new window) »

Watch a Video by Sasha Latypova (opens new window) »

As censorship increases also consider using email and text messages to send links.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.