News Digest: May 12 – May 15, 2022

All ideologies spawn psychopaths who kill innocents in its name. Yet only some are blamed for their violent adherents: by opportunists cravenly exploiting corpses while they still lie on the ground.

Very good article by Greenwald. Some highlights:

Yet virtually nobody sought to blame Chris Hayes, Joy Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Jamelle Bouie or New York Times op-ed writers for these shooting sprees. Indeed, no blame was assigned to anti-police liberal pundits whose view of American history is exactly the same as that of these two killers — even though they purposely sought to murder the same enemies whom those prominent liberals target. Nobody blamed those anti-police liberals for the same reason they did not blame Maddow and Sanders for Hodgkinson’s shooting spree: there is a fundamental and necessary distinction between people who use words to express ideas and demonize perceived enemies, and those who decide to go randomly and indiscriminately murder in the name of that ideology.

The Exception

But when a revolting murder spree is carried out in the name of right-wing ideas (or ideas perceived by the corporate press to be right-wing), everything changes — instantly and completely. In such cases, often before anything is known about the murderer — indeed, literally before the corpses are even removed from the ground where they lie — there is a coordinated effort to declare that anyone who holds any views in common with the murderer has “blood on their hands” and is essentially a co-conspirator in the massacre.

Lies

Every thing over the last 2 years and for sure the last one year on these vaccines (and lockdowns and school closures) for this mutable respiratory COVID virus, were lies. Pure lies! Meant to deceive. Not one of their lockdown lunatic polices worked, not one! All, Fauci, Bourla, Bancel, Francis Collins (the four Horsemen of the Apocalypse), all lied to you, fully! The more of these shots your[sic] get (double, triple, 4th boost), the older you are e.g. 50 and over, the more at risk of hospitalization and death. We see it in the UK data, we see it in the Scottish. We see it all over.

Why?

But we are talking now about the potential, and very shortly we theorize, for an infectious variant (immune escape variant) to emerge as before that would become enriched (proliferate) in the environment and become ‘dominant’, but one that is also highly pathogenic/lethal that could devastate humanity. Infectious and deadly at once. I know fully that the vaccine developers Pfizer and Moderna knew this could happen and they decided to still continue to roll out a non-sterilizing vaccine in the midst of a pandemic with massive infectious pressure, knowing that the sub-optimal ‘immature’ leaky immune pressure will only impose selection pressure for variants. Why? Was it purely greed? Were they that stupid? That inept? Was it malevolence? It has to be one of the two. Was it a combination of greed, ineptness, and some malevolence? I cannot believe they are that inept and incompetent. Something does not make sense that they would bring a flawed vaccine out of the gate this way.

Not a Good Thing

We theorize that this is why with the current omicron sub-variant, there is high infection in the URT and low severity in the LRT by the same variant, at the same time. This is what we have seen. It is not a ‘good’ thing. The lack of severity is potentially short-lived. We argue that selection pressure will overcome this low severity and we could be into a future (shortly) of high infectiousness, but there will no longer be ‘no severity’. We fear if we do not stop the vaccine, that there will be very serious illness coming in vaccinated persons, with selection that causes high severity.

Read the full article. Homeschool your children now. Do not leave them in public schools.

Kirsch did a quick survey of his readers. He says:

A simple survey anyone can do provides convincing evidence that the COVID vaccines have killed over 500,000 Americans. They should be halted. Now.

This was just preliminary, but he and his colleagues plan to do something more in depth. The biggest question from this survey is why hasn’t the CDC or the FDA conducted a study like this? It would be very simple to do, but they have not done it in 18 months.

I was able to accomplish something in less than 12 hours that the CDC has been unable to accomplish in 18 months: prove causality. We see both dose dependency and enormous changes in ACM deaths pre- vs. post-vaccine. We satisfy all five Bradford-Hill criteria applicable to vaccines(opens new window).

This is a paper. Here are the results:

There were 292 (4.83 % of the sample) predominantly non-Hispanic white women who identified a DCS incident during the 7.5 months of data collection in mid-to-late 2021, and 96.2% of these respondents reported that they had experienced health problems or menstrual irregularities since January 2021. The mean age was 36.1 ± 0.5 (SEM) years, with 16.5% reporting the use of intrauterine devices or hormonal contraceptives. Additionally, 9.2% reported taking non-contraceptive hormonal therapies and 17.2% reported that they were trying to conceive.

Nothing to see here. Move along. Surely not the vaccine. It’s safe and effective…

The most striking finding of this study is the remarkable incidence of decidual cast shedding (DCS) among the survey respondents, which identified 292 respondents noting a DCS event over 7.5 months in 2021. In comparison, all previously published medical literature spanning 109 years describes less than 40 cases [3-18]. Undoubtedly, this is a significant surge in DCS events. Given the contemporaneous occurrence of the pandemic and the menstrual irregularities, one can only speculate as to the exact etiology of the DCS events among the survey respondents. Normal ovulatory menstrual cycles should not result in DCS but rather in normal organized menstruation. The temporal relationship of the rapid increase in DCS with the pandemic begs the question of a relationship to other factors such as stress [20, 21], spike protein exposure (from COVID-19 or vaccination), or other factors [22]. Our data suggest that there is not a correlation between these DCS events and high levels of stress or the use of contraceptive and hormonal therapies.

This is a good article about the people fighting back against the establishment disinformation that is being spread by the Mainstream Media. There are some good charts and graphs that show the influence that people like Igor, Dr. Malone, Steve Kirsch and others are having through substack.com.

Much of the information I site comes from substack authors I trust. Many of these articles are in depth, cite peer-reviewed papers and are far more insightful than anything you’ll get on the MSM.

Another interesting observation of the author is that vaccine-skeptic substack posts tend to get a lot of comments, and spread more steadily on Twitter than other categories.

The reason for it is that many antivax posts are NOT about current events, but represent analysis that retains its meaning and value months later.

“This whistleblower information is startling,” the congressmen wrote. “You have subjected these moms and dads to the opening of an FBI investigation about them, the establishment of an FBI case file that includes their political views, and the application of a ‘threat tag’ to their names as a direct result of their exercise of their fundamental constitutional right to speak and advocate for their children.”

The congressmen noted that “parents have an undisputed right to direct the upbringing and education of their children, which includes voicing their strong opposition to controversial curricula at local schools,” and said the whistleblower information raises “serious concerns” that Garland’s Oct. 4 memorandum will “chill protected First Amendment activity as parents will rightfully fear that their passionate advocacy for their children could result in a visit from federal law enforcement.”

Go to the link and look at the chart. It’s disturbing.

This is a good article by E.J. Hare on pro-abortionists and their response to the Supreme Court leak.

Amid the predictable race-and-gender based invective against the three white men among the five-justice majority indicated by the leaked draft, there is a discernible effort to steer the discussion away from the issue at hand. We are told that this decision will be quickly followed by reversals of the right to contraception access, state-sanctioned homosexual marriage, or interracial marriage. While there is no clear connection amongst these issues beyond a reliance on “substantive due process,” implication is that the Left would prefer to deflect from talking about abortion itself toward more comfortable subjects.

I have written about the paper: “Patient Betrayal: The Corruption of Healthcare, Informed Consent and the Physician-Patient Relationship” published by a who’s who of physicians and others.

From The Epoch Times article:

“In general, in medicine, that’s never been done previously in history—that you give somebody a vaccine or a shot that they already have natural immunity to—since there’s no benefit and there’s significant potential risk.”

In September last year, the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) issued a statement that threatened physicians who “provide misinformation” about the COVID-19 vaccines—without defining what “misinformation” entails.

“The Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB), which supports its member state medical licensing boards, has recently issued a statement saying that providing misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine contradicts physicians’ ethical and professional responsibilities, and therefore may subject a physician to disciplinary actions, including suspension or revocation of their medical license. We at the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM), the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM), and the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) support FSMB’s position. We also want all physicians certified by our boards to know that such unethical or unprofessional conduct may prompt their respective board to take action that could put their certification at risk,” the statement reads.

“Disseminating Misinformation”

Dr. Paul Gabriel Gosselin D.O. had four complaints filed against him from health care professionals for writing COVID vaccine exemption letters for several health care professionals, “disseminating misinformation” about COVID, and promoting the use of medications not deemed appropriate for the treatment of the COVID.

He said his license was “emergently” suspended just prior to Thanksgiving.

Dr. James Thorp MD

Dr. James Thorp MD is board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as maternal-fetal medicine, and has practiced obstetrics for over 42 years.

He is very disappointed in the institutions that recommended the vaccine for pregnant women, and says that he has been seeing many more cases of fetal deaths and miscarriages inside mothers since the rollout of the COVID vaccines.

“It is unprecedented in the history of obstetrics that [the different institutions in charge] would violate the eternal commandment & golden rule of pregnancy: ‘never ever use a new drug or vaccine in pregnancy without years of experience and extensive long-term safety experience and pregnancy outcomes data.’ There was never any credible research documenting safety in pregnancy prior to rollout and there have been many flashing red lights from our pharmacovigilance tools that have been blatantly ignored and dismissed,” Thorp told The Epoch Times.

Read the entire article. We are not heading toward Tyranny in our country, in the medical sector we are already there.

Adam Andrzejewski, founder and president of Open the Books, told The Epoch Times on May 11 that NIH continues to withhold important information about the royalty payments, including the names of particular payers and the specific amounts paid to individuals at NIH.

“With tens of billions of dollars in grant-making at NIH and tens of millions of royalty dollars from third-party payers flowing back into the agency each year, NIH needs to come clean with the American people and open the books. We need to be able to follow the money,” Andrzejewski said.

“We believe transparency will revolutionize U.S. public policy. There is no better example of this than the third-party (think pharmaceutical companies) payments to NIH scientists. Every single outside payment to a government scientist could be a conflict of interest.”

The Moolenaar–Tabak exchange took place during a hearing on the Biden administration’s 2023 budget request.

So what? Too little, too late. When it mattered, Dorsey either agreed with it or allowed it or both. I don’t really care that he wants to jump on the bandwagon now. The stolen election has had catastrophic consequences for which Dorsey is partly responsible.