News Digest: May 28 – May 30, 2022

  • Lockdown Is Not Liberalism’s Endgame

    This article by Donald Boudreaux is short and worth reading. He concluded with this:

    As summarized by Thomas Sowell, freedom under a truly liberal order “is, above all, the right of ordinary people to find elbow room for themselves and a refuge from the rampaging presumptions of their ‘betters.’”

    True liberalism would never have countenanced the tyranny that those who presumed themselves to be our ‘betters’ wrought over the past two years.

  • After Summer, Europe to Target the Unvaccinated

    Anyone who imagines that the suspension of Covid-related measures in much of Europe means that those measures, and hence the C-19 vaccination campaign, are things of the past should have a look at the recent pronouncements on the subject of the European Commission, starting with Commission President Ursula von der Leyen’s April 27 statement on the “next pandemic phase.”

    While acknowledging that the “emergency” phase of the pandemic is over – but apparently not, on her account, the pandemic as such – von der Leyen warns that “we must remain vigilant. Infection numbers are still high in the EU and many people are still dying from COVID-19 worldwide. Moreover, new variants can emerge and spread fast.” “But we know the way forward,” she concluded, “We need to further step-up vaccination and boosting, and targeted testing”. The emphasis is mine.

  • natural immunity outperforms vaccinated AND vaccinated and recovered

    despite a number of shabby graphical tricks played to make it look less damning to vaccinated immunity, the data from this large (5.7 million people) study in the the israeli data (some of, if not the highest quality society scale data on extant) was extremely clear: those who were unvaxxed and recovered had far better immunity than the vaccinated.

    Regulatory Malpractice

    we’ve seen the direct biological manifestation in terms of inability to generate N antibodies, even post exposure to actual covid. this inhibits the generation of durable, sterilizing immunity. in fact, it prevents it. astonishingly, this was known from the original drug trials on the mRNA vaccines. but this information was not released. that is a breathtaking lapse in judgement and duty. it amounts to outright medical and regulatory malpractice.

    We Need to Move

    what has passed as public health for the last two yeas has been surreally slipshod and predatory and the ongoing tales of “this worked and you should keep doing it” are just driving us deeper into danger

    we cannot live here anymore.

  • Lockdown is a National Security Catastrophe

    In Hannah Arendt’s report on Adolf Eichmann, one of the chief architects of the Holocaust, Arendt concludes that Eichmann was no unique monster but rather a very bland individual who never developed any moral center outside of the groups to which he belonged, and had been motivated primarily by blind dedication to the goals and incentives of the Nazi regime. Arendt coined this “the banality of evil.”

    Quoting Dr. Scott Atlas:

    There is no American strength in my view of its people to say no. We can’t even say no to having a five-year-old being mandated to have a mask on his face for eight hours a day.

    Yes, Let’s Follow China.

    In fact, across institutions, the closer one gets to centers of power during the response to Covid—in government, media, and academia—the more likely the institutions and individuals have been to toe the CCP’s Party line by insisting that China’s farcically-forged Covid data is real. As a reminder, this is the narrative on which officials like these have been basing their guidance: A supervirus emerged that was so deadly only Chinese totalitarianism could stop it; it caused mass death in Wuhan (but nowhere else) until Xi’s two-month lockdown of Wuhan eliminated it from all of China (but nowhere else), where a steady stream of “variants” now demand indefinite restrictions. And this is the data that officials like these have been instructing the world to try to emulate…

    The disturbing section of this article follow the above paragraph. What you will read are many U.S. officials praising China for the way they handled the pandemic. Really? China? And we believe them because they have crushed human rights for decades? Because they are so trustworthy? After all these horrifying screenshots Senger continues:

    On the advice of officials like these, western nations imported the concept of “lockdown”—one of the most hideously totalitarian policies ever conceived—which had been pioneered by the dictator of China just two months prior. They then spent two years importing an ever-darker swathe of illiberal mandates, all in the supposed interest of “public health.” Countless businesses were ruined, human rights were upended, children lost years of education, millions starved, the mental health of billions was strained, and trillions in wealth was transferred from the world’s poorest to the very richest—all while failing to slow the spread of a virus that was subsequently confirmed to have an infection fatality rate under 0.2%.

    It’s unacceptable that our chief geopolitical adversary has had two years to reshape western civilization in much the way they would if they’d already won a conventional war against us. The fact that a dictatorship undermined our national security so easily is an inadequate reason for our children to have to live with these totalitarian precedents; on the contrary, the fact that the dictatorship was able to do so with such efficiency only highlights the risk and reinforces the need for this influence to be stopped.

    Not So Bewildering

    Or perhaps not so bewildering, given that our very own Director of National Intelligence was sitting right next to China’s CDC Director at Event 201—the first of not one, but two high-level pandemic planning scenarios in as many years the facts of which happened to come true just months later. That the fact pattern of the Monkeypox simulation came true in mid-May—the exact week of the exact month predicted by the simulation—shows that this problem is far from fixed.

  • Researcher: ‘We Made a Big Mistake’ on COVID-19 Vaccine

    This article was updated on May 29, 2022. I wouldn’t say this kind of news gets worse and worse, I’d say it simply confirms more and more what so many of us have known for a long, long time. Here are the introductory points:

    • Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Byram Bridle, Ph.D., has gained access to Pfizer’s biodistribution study from the Japanese regulatory agency. The research demonstrates a huge problem with all COVID-19 vaccines
    • The assumption that vaccine developers have been working with is that the mRNA in the vaccines would primarily remain in and around the vaccination site. Pfizer’s data, however, show the mRNA and subsequent spike protein are widely distributed in the body within hours
    • This is a serious problem, as the spike protein is a toxin shown to cause cardiovascular and neurological damage. It also has reproductive toxicity, and Pfizer’s biodistribution data show it accumulates in women’s ovaries
    • Once in your blood circulation, the spike protein binds to platelet receptors and the cells that line your blood vessels. When that happens, it can cause platelets to clump together, resulting in blood clots, and/or cause abnormal bleeding
    • Pfizer documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency also show the company failed to follow industry-standard quality management practices during preclinical toxicology studies and that key studies did not meet good laboratory practice standards

  • US Schools Facing Mass Exodus of Teachers Who Won’t Return This Fall

    The average national turnover rate was only 16 percent before COVID-19. However, in 2021, that number jumped to 25 percent.

  • COVID vaccines may impair long-term immunity to the virus; Research suggests that vaccination against COVID via mRNA vaccines may reduce body's ability to produce key type of antibody.

  • The False, Sinister, and Duplicitous Statements of the TOGETHER Ivermectin Trial Investigators

    Numerous disturbing, inconsistent, and false statements have been collected and documented by multiple researchers, journalists, and observers in communication with the TOGETHER trial investigators.

    Why So Blatant?

    I have long wondered how the investigator’s conduct can be so blatant and obvious. I only recently concluded that it is because… they don’t have to be subtle. It just doesn’t matter. The newspaper headlines are out across the world and the NIH has quietly changed its recommendation from neutral to now “against the use of ivermectin outside a clinical trial.” Which leaves us arguing over the bomb fragments of a massive detonation of what could have been world-changing and life-saving Public Health policy.

    Ruined Prospects?

    I wonder what all these investigators’ prospects are for future pharmaceutical company contracts if they blow up a 100 billion dollar market for COVID-19 vaccines and pharmaceuticals by proving the preventive and therapeutic efficacy of a generic drug?

    Interesting Response from one of the Researchers

    Hi Marc

    I hope you are well. Thank you for your email. You have been the only person courteous enough to ask the questions.

    I don’t understand the psychology of the ivermectin advocates. They fail to see the positive in this study and just focus on it not being overwhelmingly positive. I actually think it is quite positive.

    I presented this a couple weeks ago at the NIH Collaboratory Rounds and, if they listened, I advocate that actually, there is a clear signal that IVM works in COVID patients, just that our study didn’t achieve significance. In particular, there was a 17% reduction in hospitalizations that would be significant if more patients were added. I really don’t view our study as negative and, also in that talk, you will hear me retract previous statements where I had been previously negative. I think if we had continued randomizing a few hundred more patients, it would have likely been significant.

    There is a lot more in this long, thorough article by Kory.

  • Dear Friends, Sorry to Announce a Genocide

    The truth is: I’ve been rendered almost speechless — or the literary equivalent of that — because in the last little while I’ve had the unenviable task of trying to announce to the world that indeed, a genocide — or what I’ve called, clumsily but urgently, a “baby die-off” — is underway.

    Pfizer knew:

    • Vaccines didn’t work
    • Minors were experiencing heart damage
    • Spike protein did not stay in the injection site  but moved to major organs
    • 100 mcg dose could be damaging
    • That males were more susceptible to heart issues and skewed trial subjects to be 3/4 female
    • more more….

    I recommend reading this article. The work done by the volunteers from the WarRoom and the Daily Clout has been amazing.

    More highlights…

    The Volunteers have drilled deep into the Pfizer document’s reports about pregnancy and found that the assurance that the vaccine is “safe and effective” for pregnant women, was based on a study of 44 French rats, followed for 42 days (the scientists who ran the study are shareholders or employees of BioNTech).

    Baby Issues

    The Volunteers found that a baby died after nursing from a vaccinated lactating mother, and was found to have had an inflamed liver. Many babies nursing from vaccinated mothers showed agitation, gastrointestinal distress, and failure to thrive (to grow), and were inconsolable.

    I am hearing anecdotal reports of these symptoms in babies nursing from vaccinated mothers, now, from across the country.

  • Over 10,000 COVID-19 Claims Removed From VAERS, 500 Death Reports Deleted, Claims Data Analyst

    “500 death reports have already been deleted so far to date for COVID jabs. 10,000 claims have been deleted total since the rollout for COVID. I’ve spot-checked 2,000 of those claims and I cannot find the duplicate because, in the fine print, it says ‘We delete duplicates and false reports,’” Benavides said in an interview with the Stew Peters Network published on April 28.

  • Hundreds More Cases of Severe Hepatitis of Unknown Origin Reported in Children

    The World Health Organization (WHO) said in a May 27 statement that it had received reports of 650 probable cases of acute hepatitis of unknown origin in children between April 5 and May 26, with the reports coming as researchers theorize about a possible link to COVID-19, the disease caused by the as the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus.

    “The aetiology of this severe acute hepatitis remains unknown and under investigation,” the health agency said. “The cases are more clinically severe and a higher proportion develops acute liver failure compared with previous reports of acute hepatitis of unknown aetiology in children.”


    Nearly 60 percent of the reported cases were in Europe, with 222 from the United Kingdom alone. Of the 240 cases reported in the Americas overall, 216 cases were recorded in the United States.


    The children were between one and six years old, all previously healthy, with five of them admitted to hospital with significant liver injury, including some with acute liver failure.

    Possible Causes

    “We suggest that children with acute hepatitis be investigated for SARS-CoV-2 persistence in stool” and for other signals that the liver damage is happening because the spike protein of the coronavirus is a “superantigen” that over-sensitizes the immune system, the researchers said.

    Other experts have put forward the theory that, as a result of social distancing and other COVID-19-related countermeasures, young children have had less of a chance to be exposed to adenoviruses, which would have helped build up their immunity. In such cases, it is theorized, the children’s immune systems may respond to an adenovirus infection by over-producing inflammatory proteins.

    I also wonder if these children have vaccinated parents.


    Important article. Here’s the introductory paragraph and the conclusion:

    Amyloidosis is a challenging diagnosis in the absence of clinical suspicion. The two patients reported in the referenced paper LACKED ANY SYMPTOMS suggestive of amyloidosis. Instead, they presented with sudden, unexplained cardiac arrests that were persistent, treatment refractory, and ultimately fatal. Post-mortem examination unexpectedly revealed evidence of diffuse, systemic amyloidosis throughout multiple organ systems. I bring awareness to this unusual presentation of systemic amyloidosis that portends to poor outcome and I believe is now rampant due to SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Exposure.



    Look at all the types of amyloidosis listed in Pfizer’s adverse reaction document that was recently dumped.

  • 'Constant Waves of COVID': New Business Model for Pfizer

    Good article on Paxlovid. Igor states the article will explain:

    • “Constant Waves of Covid”, anticipated by Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, will be good for business for Pfizer
    • Pfizer’s Paxlovid will fuel those Covid waves
    • Pfizer and the FDA are lying about Paxlovid’s effectiveness and rebound rate
    • CDC lies about rebounds being normal “part of history”

    Pfizer’s Answer to Vaccines that Don’t Work

    Pfizer has a perfect answer to this: Paxlovid, a mix of a novel protease inhibitor nirmatrelvir, and an HIV medication ritonavir. Unlike the Covid vaccine which brings only $20 per shot, Paxlovid costs $530 per person. Even better, Paxlovid can be sold often, whenever the unfortunate Covid sufferers have their bouts of Covid.

As censorship increases also consider using email and text messages to send links.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *