A Look Back at the Demonization of the Unvaccinated
- Website: The New Normal
- Date: October 13, 2022
- View Source of A Look Back at the Demonization of the Unvaccinated (Opens new window)
Never forget.
Update on my Board of Medical Licensure Hearing October 11, which went very well
- Website: Meryl’s COVID Newsletter
- Date: October 13, 2022
- View Source of Update on my Board of Medical Licensure Hearing October 11, which went very well (Opens new window)
She said it went well. Not a lot of details.
The Most Important Whistleblower In America: Dr. Andrew Huff
- Website: Emerald Robinson’s The Right Way
- Date: October 13, 2022
- View Source of The Most Important Whistleblower In America: Dr. Andrew Huff (Opens new window)
A few weeks ago, Dr. Andrew Huff gave a sworn statement — as a former vice president of EcoHealth Alliance! — that the COVID-19 virus was created in China as “a joint project between an American company (EcoHealth Alliance) and the CCP controlled Wuhan Institute of Virology.” Dr. Huff knew this because he was an eyewitness at EcoHealth Alliance meetings.
Here are some of the other things that Huff is asserting:
The CIA and Hunter Biden were involved in funding the creation of the COVID-19 virus through third-party proxies and EcoHealth Alliance as early as 2014.
DHS officials stopped any real investigation of the origins of the virus outbreak.
The U.S. government is now illegally spying on Dr. Andrew Huff — and breaking into his house (allegedly).
Dr. Andrew Huff’s life is in danger — “armed federal agents shooting on my property.” The local sheriff has refused to help Dr. Huff or even contact him back.
Data was stolen from Dr. Andrew Huff’s house and that data was related to America’s critical food infrastructure. Dr. Huff also confirms that America’s critical food processing plats[sic] are being deliberately attacked and destroyed.
In defense of my friend Dr. Joseph Ladapo
- Website: Steve Kirsch's Newsletter
- Date: October 12, 2022
- View Source of In defense of my friend Dr. Joseph Ladapo (Opens new window)
The LA Times said his study showing the vaccines were harmful was unscientific and flawed and claimed the rates of myocarditis caused by COVID are higher than those from the vaccine. Here’s the truth.
Some Anecdotal Evidence
As for rates of myocarditis caused by COVID vs. vaccines, consider the following anecdote from the first doctor I asked about this. He’s been practicing for 30 years and never saw a case of myocarditis or pericarditis. Since the vaccines rolled out, he’s seen 4 cases. He’s hardly alone. I don’t know of any cardiologist who saw rates of myocarditis drop after the vaccines rolled out, everyone I know has seen the opposite.
They Know
Therefore, these doctors have plausible deniability; they know it is happening, they know it is ONLY happening to vaccinated kids, they know it only started after the vaccines rolled out, but until it is published in a paper in a peer-reviewed medical journal, it would be just speculation based on anecdotes. They throw the precautionary principle of medicine out the window when it comes to the “safe and effective” vaccines.
GETTING TO LOVE AB 2098 (NOT)
- Website: RICHARD JAFFE, ESQ. Lawyer
- Date: October 3, 2022
- View Source of GETTING TO LOVE AB 2098 (NOT) (Opens new window)
I have put in bold the important points the two really important parts. But, let me start with what is not so important, and it may surprise you. I think all the “disinformation” talk was just PR to stoke-up legislative sentiment and juice-up accusations against physicians. More specifically, I think “disinformation” was used to mislead those who were concerned about the bill to falsely imply that the law would just be used against doctors who were intentionally deceiving patients with “misinformation” about Covid. But in fact, the law targets speech regardless of intent, per the definition of “misinformation” and subsection (a) which includes both.
The Important Bits
All the real action, and the biggest headache for the Vaccine Concerned community will be with the definition of “misinformation”, meaning “false information that is contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus contrary to the standard of care.”
My view is that the two operative phrases “contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus” and “contrary to the standard of care” at least largely overlap. The standard of care is basically what most professionals in a given field think is the appropriate course of conduct by a professional directed towards a patient/client under the specific circumstances.
Why Four Texas Families Left Prestigious School District
- Website: The Epoch Times
- Date: October 12, 2022
- View Source of Why Four Texas Families Left Prestigious School District (Opens new window)
Parents seek a classical education for their children free from social justice issues
In memory of those who have "died suddenly" in the United States and worldwide, October 3-October 10, 2022
- Website: News from Underground by Mark Crispin Miller
- Date: October 12, 2022
- View Source of In memory of those who have "died suddenly" in the United States and worldwide, October 3-October 10, 2022 (Opens new window)
Never, never forget what they have done to us.
Anti-Science
- Website: The Naked Emperor’s Newsletter
- Date: October 12, 2022
- View Source of Anti-Science (Opens new window)
A good list of all the anti-science we have seen in the last 3 years.
FDA Just Approved Kids Covid Booster -- with ZERO Testing!
- Website: Igor's Newsletter
- Date: October 12, 2022
- View Source of FDA Just Approved Kids Covid Booster -- with ZERO Testing! (Opens new window)
Pfizer Exec Concedes COVID-19 Vaccine Was Not Tested on Preventing Transmission Before Release
- Website: The Epoch Times
- Date: October 11, 2022
- View Source of Pfizer Exec Concedes COVID-19 Vaccine Was Not Tested on Preventing Transmission Before Release (Opens new window)
Member of the European Parliament, Rob Roos, asked during a session: “Was the Pfizer COVID vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market? Did we know about stopping immunization before it entered the market?”
Pfizer’s Janine Small, president of international developed markets, said in response: “No … You know, we had to … really move at the speed of science to know what is taking place in the market.”
Roos said this:
“Millions of people worldwide felt forced to get vaccinated because of the myth that ‘you do it for others,’” Roos said. “Now, this turned out to be a cheap lie” and “should be exposed,” he added.
Nuremberg II: What a Real Inquiry into the Response to Covid Would Look Like
- Website: The New Normal
- Date: October 11, 2022
- View Source of Nuremberg II: What a Real Inquiry into the Response to Covid Would Look Like (Opens new window)
In the aftermath of the world’s catastrophic response to Covid-19, some governments have begun conducting inquiries into what went wrong. Yet owing to a combination of politics, face-saving, and outright corruption, these inquiries have generally been toothless. For example, a report published last year by the UK House of Commons concluded, backwardly, that if the UK had gone into strict lockdown three days sooner, disaster would have been averted.
Conclusions like these are as insulting to the public’s intelligence as was the response to Covid itself. The response to Covid led to the sharpest economic collapse since the Great Depression, global famine, a mental health crisis, runaway inflation, a transfer of over $3 trillion from the world’s poorest to the very richest, the premature deaths of hundreds of thousands of young people, and the worst education crisis since the Second World War.
Then the article has a list of questions that need to be answered. It’s a great list. There are 50 questions. Here are the first five:
- Why did the CDC suddenly adopt “measures to increase social distance” as official policy in 2004, contrary to all the epidemiological guidance it had developed throughout the 20th century?
- Who was behind the campaign to export the concept of “lockdown” to Liberia and Sierra Leone in 2014?
- Some intelligence reports have indicated that members of the western national security community were aware a new virus had emerged in China by fall 2019. What was being said about the virus at that time?
- If some national security officials had been worrying about a new virus in China since fall 2019, how could they have possibly believed China’s two-month lockdown of Wuhan eliminated the virus several months later?
- By January 2020, tips began to emerge that the World Health Organization was planning to recreate China’s lockdowns across the world, starting in Italy. When and on what basis did the World Health Organization make this decision?
He asks some great questions. Take a look at the rest. Here’s how he ends the article:
Though many in positions of power would prefer that we forgot, the strict lockdowns that consumed the world in 2020 are extremely well documented. Above all, these lockdowns were a chilling demonstration of just how quickly western officials, policymakers, scientists, journalists, and soon entire populations could be convinced to adopt a degree of totalitarianism in their everyday lives. Until we have real answers as to how exactly they happened, and why, there’s no reason for any thinking citizen to have confidence in the current crop of officials who claim to represent them.
Download Meme
B & W Version
You are free to download and use 's meme wherever you want (for non-commercial use only).
Please give credit and link back to the site.
Meme Transcription
Your best weapon against public education is homeschooling. Use it!

Leave a Reply