News Digest: September 12-14, 2022

Posted by

The Blind Leading the Blind by Sebastian Vrancx: Follow 'The Science'

"The Blind Leading the Blind" by Sebastiaen Vrancx, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons {{PD-US-expired}}

  • CDC Director Admits Agency Gave False Information on COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Monitoring

    It was Walt Whitman who said, “Do I contradict myself? Very well then, I contradict myself. I am large, I contain multitudes.”

    Read this article. The CDC is one big contradiction…not that we didn’t know that.

    “At no time have any CDC employees intentionally provided false information,” a CDC spokesperson, when correcting the agency’s previous responses, told The Epoch Times via email in August.

    That’s an interesting distinction: “intentionally…” So very easily, apparently, they “unintentionally” provided false information. Good intentions are no excuse for bad outcomes.

    Hell (Detail) by Hieronymus Bosch. Text: Walensky: Don't worry this next version of the CDC will be even better. (Color Version)

  • The Movie: [s]election.code

    Watch this movie.

    Man stuffing a ballot box with this text: TRUMP WON. We Will Never Forget.

  • Election fraud in America: the evidence

    Once you open your eyes to the possibility that the systems you trust aren’t as trustable as you were led to believe, you start to see things that you could never before consider possible.

    This is exactly right. I don’t know what Kirsch thought about the election being stolen a year ago or before he started his vaccine journey, but I’d guess he didn’t think it was. But as he says, once you begin questioning one segment of the government it dawns on you that maybe you can’t trust any of it.

    How can you tell who is telling you the truth?

    It’s easy. In almost all cases, it’s the people who are not camera shy.

    It a good, short article. Take a look at it.

    Two guys laughing: ...and Republicans still think we're going to have real elections in November.

  • Rockefeller Foundation, Nonprofits Spending Millions on Behavioral Psychology Research to ‘Nudge’ More People to Get COVID Vaccines

    The Rockefeller Foundation, the National Science Foundation and other nonprofits are pouring millions of dollars into a research initiative “to increase uptake of COVID-19 vaccines and other recommended public health measures by countering mis- and disinformation.”

    Some Techniques

    Some of the “interventions” proffered by the Rockefeller Foundation include “literacy training for secondary school students” to “help students identify COVID-19 vaccine misinformation,” “equipping trusted messengers with communication strategies to increase COVID-19 vaccination demand” and “using social networks to share tailored, community-developed messaging to increase COVID-19 vaccination demand.”

    It’s just Propaganda no matter what they say

    ZeroHedge, however, countered that behind all the rhetoric, the focus of the Mercury Project, is “propaganda, propaganda and propaganda,” and “the very basis of the existence of the Mercury Project presupposes that individuals cannot be trusted to make up their own minds about the information they are exposed to.”

    The expectation is that individuals “must be molded to accept the mainstream narrative,” ZeroHedge said, while presupposing that “mainstream or establishment information is always trustworthy and unbiased.”

    Man in suit with television head and covid syringe on screen. Shadow of man holding strings attached smaller shadowed men with syringes in their shoulders....except for one, with no string and no syringe.

  • Thousands of Californians Write Gov. Newsom to Veto COVID Misinformation Bill

    In an AVFCA press release, the organization’s founder, Christina Hildebrand, called the bill “duplicative and unnecessary.”

    Hildebrand further said, “AB 2098 defines ‘misinformation’ as ‘false information that is contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus contrary to the standard of care.’ With the ever mutating variants, changing vaccine efficacy and influx or treatments, how can there be ‘contemporary scientific consensus’ or ‘standard of care’ for COVID?”

    Will Doctors Want to Practice in California?

    Additionally, the Coalition fears that a potential “unintended consequence might be that the healthcare provider shortage would be exacerbated by the proposed law.” In other words, they fear that if California passes such legislation that makes the medical field increasingly hostile to dissenting doctors, then less doctors will seek out California as a state to practice medicine in.

    Gandalf and the Balrog: California Assembly Bill 2098. "You shall not pass!"

  • questions on pharma promotion

    Go read this entire article. Lots of memes, videos, paper headlines, etc showing Fauci and others contradicting themselves over the years. Good stuff.

  • ‘Unethical’ and up to 98 Times Worse Than the Disease: Top Scientists Publish Paradigm-Shifting Study About COVID-19 Vaccines

    This 50-page study, which was published on The Social Science Research Network at the end of August, analyzed CDC and industry-sponsored data on vaccine adverse events, and concluded that mandates for COVID-19 boosters for young people may cause 18 to 98 actual serious adverse events for each COVID-19 infection-related hospitalization theoretically prevented.

    Salmaan Keshavjee, M.D., Ph.D.

    But among this team of high-profile international experts who authored this paper, perhaps the most notable is Salmaan Keshavjee, M.D., Ph.D., current Director of the Harvard Medical School Center for Global Health Delivery, and professor of Global Health and Social Medicine at Harvard Medical School. Keshavjee has also worked extensively with Partners In Health, a Boston-based non-profit co-founded by the late Dr. Paul Farmer, on treating drug-resistant tuberculosis, according to his online biography.

    Boosters are Unethical

    Against a backdrop of confusing and often changing public health recommendations and booster fatigue, the authors of this new paper argue that university booster mandates are unethical. They give five specific reasons for this bold claim:

    1) Lack of policymaking transparency. The scientists pointed out that no formal and scientifically rigorous risk-benefit analysis of whether boosters are helpful in preventing severe infections and hospitalizations exists for young adults.

    2) Expected harm. A look at the currently available data shows that mandates will result in what the authors call a “net expected harm” to young people. This expected harm will exceed the potential benefit from the boosters.

    3) Lack of efficacy. The vaccines have not effectively prevented transmission of COVID-19. Given how poorly they work—the authors call this “modest and transient effectiveness”—the expected harms caused by the boosters likely outweigh any benefits to public health.

    4) No recourse for vaccine-injured young adults. Forcing vaccination as a prerequisite to attend college is especially problematic because young people injured by these vaccines will likely not be able to receive compensation for these injuries.

    5) Harm to society. Mandates, the authors insisted, ostracize unvaccinated young adults, excluding them from education and university employment opportunities. Coerced vaccination entails “major infringements to free choice of occupation and freedom of association,” the scientists wrote, especially when “mandates are not supported by compelling public health justification.”

    Support those taking risks

    As we wrote in May, an increasing number of scientists and medical doctors are speaking out about the dubious efficacy and disturbing safety issues surrounding theses fast-tracked COVID-19 vaccines. They do so fully aware of the personal and professional risks involved. They deserve our encouragement and support.

    Two reporters looking into a deep valley on the edge of a cliff. On the other side is a sign: The Truth. One journalist says, You know what? Let's just write propaganda.

  • 400 Doctors and Professionals Declare International Medical Crisis Due to Covid Vaccine Injuries and Deaths

    Over 400 doctors, scientists and professionals from more than 34 countries this morning declared an international medical crisis due to “diseases and death associated with the ‘COVID-19 vaccines’”.

    Launched at a press conference on Saturday, September 10th, the declaration states: “We are currently witnessing an excess in mortality in those countries where the majority of the population has received the so-called ‘COVID-19 vaccines’. To date, this excess mortality has neither been sufficiently investigated nor studied by national and international health institutions.”

    Health leader talking to the propagandized masses: It is for sure not the vaccine. I can guarantee you that it is not the vaccine. Nope. Nope, not the vaccine. It is not the vaccine. It is not the vaccine. It is not the vaccine, it is not...blah, blah, blah, blah, blah... (color version)

  • Judge Orders Fauci to Cough It Up

    A lawsuit against the federal government – Anthony Fauci in particular – from the Attorneys General of Missouri and Louisiana has been brewing for a good part of the summer of 2022. The issue concerns the censoring of certain high-level experts on social media, three of whom are senior scholars of the Brownstone Institute. We know for sure that this censorship began early in the pandemic response and included exchanges between Fauci and then head of NIH Francis Collins, who called for a “quick and devastating takedown” of the Great Barrington Declaration.

    Still a Violation of Free Speech

    The Framers guaranteed that Congress would make no law “abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.” The Constitution never allowed an exception for an administrative bureaucracy answerable not even to voters to collaborate with large-scale private corporations to obtain the same result by other means. It’s still a violation of free speech.

    Some Added Fireworks

    The initial complaint was filed May 5, 2022 and can be read in full here(opens new window). It includes vast evidence of collusion between government officials and social media companies. But the government answered by claiming some kind of executive privilege and would not fork over information.

    An amended complaint(opens new window) added the fireworks: It documented that 50 government officials in a dozen agencies were involved in applying pressure to social media companies to censor users, reports(opens new window) Zachary Stieber of Epoch Times.

    That second filing might have flipped the switch and resulted in the judge’s decision to pull no punches. Indeed, it is a remarkable document(opens new window), reproducing vast amounts of correspondence between government agencies and Facebook, Google, and Twitter.

    What you see here is not antagonism but obsequious friendship: ongoing, relentless, guileless, as if nothing could be wrong here. They knew what they believed to be the problem voices and were determined to stamp them out. And that target included the documented censorship of top scientists associated with Brownstone Institute along with thousands of other credible experts and regular citizens who disagreed with the government’s extreme policy response to Covid.

    Tony Fauci holding up a card that says: The science is whatever I need it to be.

Download Meme

B & W Version

You are free to download and use 's meme wherever you want (for non-commercial use only).
Please give credit and link back to the site.

Meme Transcription

Follow “The Science”

“The Blind Leading the Blind” by Sebastiaen Vrancx, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons {{PD-US-expired}}

As censorship increases also consider using email and text messages to send links.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *