Obviously, anyone who would kill children like this should be executed…
Posted byThe Inmate
Obviously, anyone who would kill children like this should be executed, and all the more so if she is too mentally defective to know that killing children is wrong. With that caveat out of the way, I also know that the social engineers (1) hate us and want to harm us and (2) use stories like this to manipulate us and to divert our time, energy, and attention towards things that benefit them and harm us. And I know that they lie. Constantly. About everything. And no lie is too big for them to tell with a straight face. Whether this facts of this case really happened or not, the bottom line remains this: be cautious, because the social engineers are doubtlessly steering the public controversy in a harmful direction.
By training people to view loved ones as threats, the mechanism functions as a devastating segue into attacking the family unit itself. Marriage, parenthood, and private family life are recast as environments to be monitored and managed by institutions. The more fear and suspicion inserted between family members, the easier it becomes to weaken the family as an independent source of loyalty and protection. Fragmented families are easier to govern because people increasingly look to authorities for security once found in each other.
In 2010, Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi stood beside Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi in Rome and declared that Europe must pay Libya five billion euros each year if it wished to remain European. He spoke without hesitation about the millions waiting to cross from Africa, describing vast numbers of poor and uneducated migrants whose arrival, he argued, would fundamentally transform the continent. He warned that Europe would cease to be recognizably European and asked what answer White Christian nations could possibly offer once such a movement gathered full momentum. He invoked the memory of the barbarian invasions that had brought down the old Roman order, presenting himself as the final barrier between Africa and Europe. Berlusconi offered no meaningful reply.
But what we are witnessing is not tolerance, but subjection.
Posted byThe Inmate
It is not a hatred for Islam or Muslims; have we not tolerated them along with all other religions, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, etc.? But what we are witnessing is not tolerance, but subjection. No other religion asks of its Christian neighbors to hide their dogs, cover their women, refrain from BBQ and bacon. None other demands to spread their daily prayers into the air, much worse than a preacher on a street corner, for the call to prayer reaches out miles from the source to annoy and antagonize the Christian population. When are Muslims ticketed for violations of the sound ordinances? What other American could so blatantly defy the powers of government or even an HOA with such impunity?
Okoro, Ikoba, and colleagues did something almost too obvious to be radical: they simply compared COVID-19 deaths in the pre-vaccine period against the vaccination period —using the WHO’s own data— and asked what happened.
Here’s what happened:
Africa: 43.3% increase in COVID deaths with vaccination
Eastern Mediterranean: 350.9% increase
South-East Asia: 403.7% increase
Europe: 496.5% increase
Americas: 705.9% increase
Western Pacific: 1,275.0% increase
Let that sit for a moment. The Western Pacific region —Australia, Japan, South Korea, countries with advanced healthcare systems and very high vaccination uptake— saw COVID deaths multiply by nearly 13-fold after the vaccines were deployed.
Classical Arabic sources associate deen with obedience, submission, judgment, authority, governance, requital, and an entire system of life lived under a higher authority. Quranic usage reinforces this broader meaning. Deen is used in connection with legislation, enforcement, reward and punishment, social order, political authority, and the system Allah intends to prevail over all others. The dominion verses – Koran 9:33, 48:28, and 61:9 – all use the word deen, not religion, creed, or church.
Mercy is for the repentant. Mercy is for the person who turns around, faces what they did, names it, and asks to be held to account. That is the one thing none of these officials did. They did not come forward. They were dragged forward, years late, by journalists and whistleblowers and the parents of dead and broken children, every inch of the way resisting. When the truth came for Rotherham, the council’s instinct was not confession. According to the audit’s account, the council sought an injunction to stop a newspaper publishing, and then asked the police to launch a criminal inquiry into who had leaked the information, rather than into the men abusing the children. Faced with the choice between the abuser and the person who exposed the abuse, they went after the person who exposed it.
They dethroned her in the nineteenth century. They told themselves they were cleaning house, removing superstition from the temple of reason, liberating inquiry from the dead hand of dogma. What they did not notice, because it takes generations to notice this kind of thing, is that when you remove the question that orients all the other questions, you do not get purer science. You get science without a compass. You get inquiry without a destination. You get the most technically proficient, directionally lost institution in human history.
When the laws of Western societies conflict with the cultural norms of immigrant groups
Posted byThe Inmate
When the laws of Western societies conflict with the cultural norms of immigrant groups, too often Western officials avoid confronting abuses and violations that they would never otherwise permit. In the name of cultural sensitivity, vulnerable women in these communities are abandoned by the systems that should protect them.
At some point the claim that the text is innocent and only the readers are guilty must be rejected.
Posted byThe Inmate
The “moderate” is telling us that the source code is flawless and that everyone who reads it as a mandate for violence and Islamic hegemony has simply misread it, century after century, across every school and every continent. More than 60,000 Islamic terror attacks have taken place in the last few decades. At some point the claim that the text is innocent and only the readers are guilty must be rejected. When a document is read the same dangerous way by enough people for long enough, the problem is no longer confined to the readers.
Recent Comments