Quotes • Nov 8 – Nov 18 • Chemtrail Conspirators Right Again • What Will We Panic Over Next? • Tina Peters Still in Prison • Free Speech in Germany…Not!

No matter: Yesterday morning, police acting on behalf of the Ulm public prosecutor’s office raided Damian’s home. He is suspected of the crime of inciting hatred (in violation of Section 130 of the German Criminal Code) for his rough remark about government “parasites.”

…

This has all the hallmarks of another NGO-driven speech investigation. We have a low-visibility post containing a suggestive vocabulary item (“Parasit”) that was likely uncovered via keyword search, a lazy attempt to find a distantly relevant criminal statute and then maximum police harassment and intimidation because as in all these cases the process is most of the punishment.

By now, whenever you hear anyone invoke the phrase “saving our democracy,” that should be a signal that they are intent on destroying this republic, and with that, your natural rights to free speech, economic liberty, and public order.

…

We’re entering a new phase in the ongoing color revolution, the coup against America, and it’s liable to be the final phase in which all the mystery gets wrung out, the motives are revealed, and the players are correctly sorted and labeled according to their deeds. No new psychodrama will avail to stop what’s coming.

As eugyppius knows this is a strategy, a feature, not a bug:

Since 2020, serial media-driven panic has characterised the government of Germany. First there was the original panic, namely the great Covid hysteria. As the vaccines failed, a new panic over the Russian invasion of Ukraine took centre stage, and when Ukraine’s prospects soured with the failed counteroffensive in 2023, we had still a third panic – this one over Alternative für Deutschland and the alleged political menace of “the extreme right.” The steady parade of panics feels almost systematic. It’s like we can’t get rid of one panic, however defunct and unproductive it has become, until another panic has edged it out.

…

Perhaps our politicians have embraced panic as a useful principle of rulership, or perhaps panic generation has simply become an immanent property of the managerial system and its journalist collaborators.

Tina Peters is the example to scare anyone else who is thinking about contesting an election…to reconsider. She did the right thing, now she’s in jail.

Tina Peters (70) is a cancer survivor whose Navy SEAL son was killed in a parachuting accident in 2017. She is the former Mesa County Clerk in Colorado. She was corruptly sentenced to 9 years in prison by that state’s government for trying to secure the 2020 election. She has been imprisoned for over a year and ahe[sic] has been denied bail while pursuing her appeal. Many believe she will win her appeal.

Illegal aliens who have committed child rape have been released on bail en masse but not Tina Peters, who has never had a traffic ticket. This is unacceptable.

And conveniently, COP30—this year’s UN Climate Action Conference in Brazil—isn’t focused on the atmosphere anymore. It’s about “integrating health into climate resilience,” complete with new programs for immunization, surveillance, and disease control.

Translation: they’re merging climate finance with public health to channel billions into the same old institutions—this time under the banner of “resilience.”

The conspirators have a good track record.

The Royal Society has published a report on solar radiation modification (SRM) schemes such as stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) and marine cloud brightening (MCB) with emphasis on governance of “research,” ultimately to be overseen by an unaccountable, unelected international body.

Though public perception is recognized as an important factor, the overwhelming lack of public consent for SRM experiments is not mentioned in the brief.

Some quotes from the actual report:

…confident detection of the impact of SRM on surface temperatures might take decades.

LOL. “Well, we said we might not be able to detect in our lifetime….sorry for all the shade.”

Here’s a great one:

Participants were also asked to make an objective assessment of risks (potential for adverse consequences) of each technique, but following concern about its interpretation from peer reviewers, it was not used here.[emphasis mine]

Yes, let’s not let any peer reviewers, that might think the risks outweigh the benefits, get one look at our crazy plans!